Notable Calls

RSS feed
Notablecalls@gmail.com

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

 

U.S. Steel (NYSE:X): Most leverage to rising steel prices/attractive cost position—Buy

Goldman Sachs is upgrading U.S. Steel Group (NYSE:X) to Buy from Neutral with a 6-month price target of $75 (prev. $61) representing upside of $28%.

Firm notes they believe that rising steel prices and increasingly positive leading indicators of demand are pointing to a steel industry that should see its earnings markedly improve in near to medium terms. With a high leverage to steel prices and demand, and one of the best cost positions on the raw materials, they see potentially significant upside to US Steel’s share price.

Goldman believes that markets’ concerns about recent dip in scrap prices are over done. The domestic steel prices should get strong support from rising global steel cost curve, which in turn should push global steel prices further up. We see companies with vertical integration into raw materials as the best investment option in this environment. US Steel, thus fits the best among our coverage. Additionally, its high fixed cost structure (or high leverage to rising utilization rate) puts it in an advantage as steel demand and thus the utilization rate are expected to continue to rise in coming months. They estimate US Steel’s utilization rate to rise to 85% in 2011 from 76% in 2010.

US Steel’s earnings have suffered and the company has struggled to generate profits as the utilization rate has remained below optimal level. As both prices and production rates are rising, its favorable cost structure on raw materials provide it relatively better opportunity than its peers to generate strong earnings.

US Steel’s iron ore costs in the US is less than $65 per tonne (vs. current global spot price of $191 per tonne) and its 2011 coking coal contract price is set at about $200 per tonne (vs. current global spot price of $312 per tonne). These favorable input costs imply that as utilization rate rise and fixed costs are spread over higher tonnage, X should have one of the highest leverage to improving conditions.

But scrap price is falling, shouldn’t steel follow
An obvious risk in this scenario is the scrap price. In recent months, it was rising scrap prices that heralded in the current round of price increases. This was exacerbated by a seasonal uptick in demand. Once the weather improves and scrap flow into the yards increases, scrap prices usually fall. That said, the firm believes that the market is missing the point that although raw material prices have been the primary source of rising steel pries, demand (both real and apparent) has also strengthened and thus they see less risk from a modest dip in scrap prices, at least in the near term


- Goldman still expects the 1Q2011 loss at $0.61 for X due to the lag in contract prices as compared to the spot prices but consider this as a timing issue.

The same contracts will help US Steel sustain earnings beyond 1Q. Goldman now expects higher shipment volume (an increase of 13% year over year vs. 9% earlier) with estimate of the utilization rate of 85% (up from 82% earlier) for US Steel’s Domestic Flat Rolled division. This should help offset some of the fixed costs per ton. They are also lowering their coking coal cost for US Steel to $185 per ton from $200 they had estimated earlier. This is in line with the guidance provided by the company in its 4Q conference call. As such Goldman's 2011 estimates have moved up to $3.50 from $2.50.

They are also raising their 2012 and 2013 estimates on higher than expected utilization rate and hence higher shipment volume, particularly for its Flat Rolled Division.

Notablecalls: Goldman is essentially saying Tanners, the UBS analyst is wrong on her Scrap Steel call. Tanners left a 5% dent on the space but looks like the shorts are now trapped as the group is back to its highs.

X may see $63 level today on this call, I suspect. Let's see how it goes.

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   July 2011   August 2011   September 2011   October 2011   November 2011   December 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?